USEUROPEAFRICAASIA中文双语FrançaisHOMECHINAWORLDBUSINESSLIFESTYLECULTURETRAVELWATCHTHISSPORTSOPINIONREGIONALFORUMNEWSPAPERChina Daily PDFChina Daily E-paperMOBILEOpinionCartoonsEditorialsOp-EdColumnistsFrom the PressOpinion LineFrom the ReadersBureau ChiefForum TrendsHome / Opinion / Chen WeihuaDodging key question on Snowdens revelations
By Chen Weihua | China Daily | Updated:2013-06-28 08:14Yahoo News has done an interesting analysis of the 444 briefings through June 18 by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and found 13 distinct ways in which he dodges reporters questions.For example, he replied with “I dont have the answer” 1,905 times; “I would refer you to someone else” 1,383 times; “You already know the answer” 1,125 times and “I am not going to tell you” 939 times.Carney, a former Washington bureau chief for Time magazine, may be an expert in evading the medias pursuit of answers. But I assume all government spokespersons do that to a greater or lesser extent. Carney and many US officials have been extremely skillful in dodging questions on the Edward Snowden case and misdirecting public attention.Instead of addressing the international concern over its global surveillance program conducted by the US National Security Agency, the US has continued to divert attention from its actions by describing the NSA contractor first as a traitor who leaks information that aids terrorists and now as a felon who stole classified government information.When the Chinese government requested the Obama administration explain the aggressive hacking into Chinese cellphone companies to access the text messages of millions of citizens and the attack on the networks at Tsinghua University and computers at the Hong Kong headquarters of telecom service provider Pacnet, the US again avoided the issue, accusing China of failing to arrest Snowden instead.US officials, including Carney, have claimed that not detaining Snowden in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region will have a negative impact on the bilateral relationship, conveniently masking the fact that it is the US massive hacking of China that has cast a shadow over relations.On Wednesday, US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel also expressed his disappointment at the Chinese government. He too failed to mention how more disappointed China should be at the NSA aggression.Previous1 2 NextPrevious1 2 NextRelated StoriesMore Americans see Snowden as patriot: PollWhistle-blower Snowden still at Moscow airportChina rejects US accusations over SnowdenRussia rules out Snowden expulsionUS files criminal charges against Snowden over leaksCartoonsTHAADBrexit talksImported garbageGreen new homeSouth China SeaHate has no home thereMost Viewed in 24 HoursFroum trendsHow do foreigners view govts push against desertification?Is mahjong gaining popularity worldwide?ColumnistsEnvoys job to mend ties, not drive a wedgeEU is not totally safe against terrorists despite strict measuresForumFeatured ContributorsXiamen BRICS Summit will inject vitality into China-Indian relationsTraveling on board Chinas trains for 30 yearsChina Daily Bureau ChiefsChongqing and Chengdu City Cluster on faster trackXi-Ma meeting brings historic opportunitiesStar BloggersThe past 5 years: Chinas global leadershipGetting stared at in China: Cultural curiosity, globalization and racismBACK TO THE TOPHOMECHINAWORLDBUSINESSLIFESTYLECULTURETRAVELWATCHTHISSPORTSOPINIONREGIONALFORUMNEWSPAPERChina Daily PDFChina Daily E-paperMOBILECopyright 1995 -var oTime = new Date();
document.write(oTime.getFullYear());. All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.License for publishing multimedia online 0108263Registration Number: 130349About China DailyAdvertise on SiteContact UsJob OfferExpat EmploymentFOLLOW US

By 多哈


邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

4 − 1 =