left corner中文 US EUROPE ASIA PACIFICleft cornerGo Adv SearchHomeChinaPoliticsSocietyScience/TechPeopleChina SceneHot IssuesBeijingRegionalSpecial CoveragesWorldAsia & PacificAmericasEuropeAfricaMiddle EastAround the WorldNewsmakerCountry ProfileBusinessEconomyCompaniesMarketsIndustriesOpinionPolicy & RegulationAutoChina WeeklyGreen ChinaBusiness Daily UpdatesE-shopSportsChinaStarsGolfTennisOther SportsFoodRestaurantsNewsGood Bites ChinaOrganic LifeDrinksVideosGourmet ForumSweet NothingsSpecialsLifeTravelFoodArtsBooksHeritageHot PotX-rayEntertainmentCelebritiesMoviesMusicTelevisionStyleSpecialsPhotoChinaWorldSportsSlidesOddPhotographersVideoNewsBig TalkChina LiteTradition MissionFocusDigest ChinaOpinionEditorialsOp-Ed ContributorsColumnistsWeb CommentsSpecialsFrom Chinese PressFrom the readersForumNews TalkLife in ChinaLeisure TimeLanguage learningStudying OverseasClassifiedCartoonLanguage TipsBilingual NewsHot WordsBuzzwordsTranslationAudioSurvival EnglishMovie EnglishStudy AbroadOpinionEditorials
Op-Ed Contributors
Web Comments
Thought Leaders
From the Press
From Overseas Press
SpecialsHome
/ Opinion/ Chen WeihuaHonesty should be ticket to White HouseUpdated: 2012-10-19 07:22By Chen Weihua ( China Daily)Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  SmallFact-checkers in the United States have been busy after the second presidential debate on Tuesday evening at Hofstra University. They want to find out whether President Barack Obama will hike the tax on the middle class by $4,000 a year or whether Republican challenger Mitt Romney is capable of creating 12 million jobs in four years with his tax plan.
But as Romney pollster Neil Newhouse suggested months ago fact-checkers are biased. Otherwise why are no fact-checkers bothering to dig into Obama and Romneys rants about China on Tuesday night?Romney repeatedly shouted that he will label China a currency manipulator on his first day in office. But even researchers at the Peterson Institute in Washington now say the Chinese currency is only undervalued by about 7 percent against the US dollar.The yuan has appreciated more than 30 percent since 2005 and Chinas current account surplus narrowed to only 2.1 percent of the gross domestic product in the first half of this year. So most experts believe that there is not a case to be made for yuan appreciation.Is Romney just ignorant of this or is his mind simply frozen in the past?Obama could challenge Romney on this currency lie, but that might prove costly since it seems it is suicidal to appear soft on and close to China during this US presidential race.Amid the US economic woes, many Americans want to see the president taking on China, which they view as a threat to their economic supremacy, just as their country took on Japan in the 1980s and the former Soviet Union in the Cold War era.So Obama has competed with Romney to show who will be toughest on China, holding up his decision to impose punitive tariffs on Chinese tires that he claims saved American jobs as proof of his intentions. However, the Washington-based US-China Business Council said while the tariffs reduced tire imports from China, the vacuum was not filled by US producers, but by cheap imports from places such as Indonesia and Mexico.A Peterson Institute study shows that American consumers ended up paying an extra $1.1 billion for tires in 2011 due to the tariffs, which reduced their spending on other goods.In his book No Apology, Romney said Obamas action “may make good politics by repaying unions for their support of his campaign, but it is decidedly bad for the nation and our workers. Protectionism stifles productivity”.Yet in a tight race, Romney knows that such common sense is political poison. So he says what he thinks the voters want to hear. That is also why Romney felt so defenseless when he was accused by Obama of investing in companies that are pioneers in outsourcing to China.When I talked to Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a US think tank, he said the two candidates cannot be honest because most Americans, in fact most people anywhere, dont understand economics all that well.For politicians in the US, cashing in on this ignorance helps win votes.Americans take the honesty of their presidents seriously. They launched a crusade against Bill Clinton in 1998 for lying about his affairs with a White House intern Monica Lewinsky. But it seems that lying blatantly and repeatedly during the presidential campaign is a different kettle of fish.After all, no more than half the American public trust Obama or Romney, and only 6 percent have a confidence in Congress, according to Gallup and The Harris Poll.The author, based in New York, is deputy editor of China Daily USA. E-mail: chenweihua@chinadaily.com.cn(China Daily 10/19/2012 page8)8.03KRelated StoriesObama and Romney indulge in debatable accusationsObama outperforms Romney in high-stake 2nd debateRomney attacks Obama on foreign policyObama and Romney fight about US economy at debateMost ViewedTodays Top NewsAn amendment that could hurt US interestsIncreasing upward mobilityStock investors display double visionCold facts of a warming worldXi offers hope of claritySCOs role for peaceAnti-corruption action…ColumnistsOp RanaDoha is going the Durban wayZhu YuanPragmatism is the way forwardmoreCommentatorsBrian SalterWhat does Chinas TV regulator do most of the time?Han DongpingAmerican arrogance in display againmoreCartoonDebt CrisisGlobal warming Trouble in EurozoneGovernment jobs competitionSpecialWitnessing Chinas prosperityCourageous momentsForumVeiled beautiesTree house……| About China Daily | Advertise on Site | Contact Us | Job Offer |Copyright 1995 – 2010 . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.License for publishing multimedia online 0108263             Registration Number: 20100000002731      

By 多哈

发表评论

邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

16 + 16 =